cleaning up so well (jones_casey) wrote,
cleaning up so well

  • Music:


"softly, softly; don't thee snap and snarl, friend."

he could now examine the panther at ease; its muzzle was smeared with blood.

"she's had a good dinner," he thought, without troubling himself as to whether her feast might have been on human flesh. "she won't be hungry when she gets up."

she had soon afterwards reason to believe that the beginning was already made, and could not but hope that the gipsy, though she had told no fortune, might be proved to have made harriet's. about a fortnight after the alarm, they came to a sufficient explanation, and quite undesignedly. emma was not thinking of it at the moment, which made the information she received more valuable. she merely said, in the course of some trivial chat, "well, harriet, whenever you marry i would advise you to do so and so"—and thought no more of it, till after a minute's silence she heard harriet say in a very serious tone, "i shall never marry."

emma then looked up, and immediately saw how it was; and after a moment's debate, as to whether it should pass unnoticed or not, replied,

"never marry!—this is a new resolution."

"it is one that i shall never change, however."

but, after all, the great plays, those that take the deepest hold upon the heart, like hamlet and king lear, macbeth and othello, are not love-plays. and the most charming comedies, like the winter's tale, and the rivals, and rip van winkle, are chiefly memorable for other things than love-scenes.

even in novels, love shows at its best when it does not absorb the whole plot. lorna doone is a lovers' story, but there is a blessed minimum of spooning in it, and always enough of working and fighting to keep the air clear and fresh. the heart of midlothian, and hypatia, and romola, and the cloister and the hearth, and john inglesant, and the three musketeers, and notre dame, and peace and war, and quo vadis,--these are great novels because they are much more than tales of romantic love. as for henry esmond, (which seems to me the best of all,) certainly "love at first sight" does not play the finest role in that book.

there are good stories of our own day--pathetic, humourous, entertaining, powerful--in which the element of romantic love is altogether subordinate, or even imperceptible. the rise of silas lapham does not owe its deep interest to the engagement of the very charming young people who enliven it. madame delphine and ole 'stracted are perfect stories of their kind. i would not barter the jungle books for a hundred of the brushwood boy.

the truth is that love, considered merely as the preference of one person for another of the opposite sex, is not "the greatest thing in the world." it becomes great only when it leads on, as it often does, to heroism and self-sacrifice and fidelity. its chief value for art (the interpreter) lies not in itself, but in its quickening relation to the other elements of life. it must be seen and shown in its due proportion, and in harmony with the broader landscape.

do you believe that in all the world there is only one woman specially created for each man, and that the order of the universe will be hopelessly askew unless these two needles find each other in the haystack? you believe it for yourself, perhaps; but do you believe it for tom johnson? you remember what a terrific disturbance he made in the summer of 189-, at bar harbor, about ellinor brown, and how he ran away with her in september. you have also seen them together (occasionally) at lenox and newport, since their marriage. are you honestly of the opinion that if tom had not married ellinor, these two young lives would have been a total wreck?

adam smith, in his book on the moral sentiments, goes so far as to say that "love is not interesting to the observer because it is an affection of the imagination, into which it is difficult for a third party to enter." something of the same kind occurred to me in regard to tom and ellinor. yet i would not have presumed to suggest this thought to either of them. nor would i have quoted in their hearing the melancholy and frigid prediction of ralph waldo emerson, to the effect that they would some day discover "that all which at first drew them together--those once sacred features, that magical play of charm--was deciduous."

on the other hand he offers you free access to the inmost recesses of his own soul, and stupefies you with the candour of his revelations.

then, with a boy's sudden and easy quickness in forgetting past troubles, "tell me, falworth," said he, "when wilt thou give me that knife thou promised me--the one thou break the blade of yesterday?"

"i know not," said myles, bluntly, vexed that the boy did not take the disgrace of his beating more to heart. "some time soon, mayhap. me thinks thou shouldst think more of thy beating than of a broken knife. now get thee gone to thy business. that kind being, who is a friend to the friendless, shall recompence thee for this."
Tags: bricolage

  • as lj lay dying

    they seem to have removed the feature to look back deeper into the friends feed than just the most recent entries. perhaps it's just a temporary…

  • random gripe

    it's not realistic but one expects perfection in certain arenas and jeopardy clues are one of those. today's misstep (not really today's since the…

  • term of art

    time crystal engineering

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded